I have a Map which is to be modified by several threads concurrently.
There seem to be three different synchronized Map implementations in the Java API:
Hashtable
Collections.synchronizedMap(Map)
ConcurrentHashMap
From what I understand, Hashtable
is an old implementation (extending the obsolete Dictionary
class), which has been adapted later to fit the Map
interface. While it is synchronized, it seems to have serious scalability issues and is discouraged for new projects.
But what about the other two? What are the differences between Maps returned by Collections.synchronizedMap(Map)
and ConcurrentHashMap
s? Which one fits which situation?
Answer
For your needs, use ConcurrentHashMap
. It allows concurrent modification of the Map from several threads without the need to block them. Collections.synchronizedMap(map)
creates a blocking Map which will degrade performance, albeit ensure consistency (if used properly).
Use the second option if you need to ensure data consistency, and each thread needs to have an up-to-date view of the map. Use the first if performance is critical, and each thread only inserts data to the map, with reads happening less frequently.
No comments:
Post a Comment