Thursday, August 1, 2019

Java is NEVER pass-by-reference, right?...right?





Possible Duplicate:
Is Java “pass-by-reference”?






I found an unusual Java method today:




private void addShortenedName(ArrayList voiceSetList, String vsName)
{
if (null == vsName)
vsName = "";
else
vsName = vsName.trim();
String shortenedVoiceSetName = vsName.substring(0, Math.min(8, vsName.length()));
//SCR10638 - Prevent export of empty rows.
if (shortenedVoiceSetName.length() > 0)
{

if (!voiceSetList.contains("#" + shortenedVoiceSetName))
voiceSetList.add("#" + shortenedVoiceSetName);
}
}


According to everything I've read about Java's behavior for passing variables, complex objects or not, this code should do exactly nothing. So um...am I missing something here? Is there some subtlety that was lost on me, or does this code belong on thedailywtf?


Answer



As Rytmis said, Java passes references by value. What this means is that you can legitimately call mutating methods on the parameters of a method, but you cannot reassign them and expect the value to propagate.




Example:



private void goodChangeDog(Dog dog) {
dog.setColor(Color.BLACK); // works as expected!
}
private void badChangeDog(Dog dog) {
dog = new StBernard(); // compiles, but has no effect outside the method
}



Edit: What this means in this case is that although voiceSetList might change as a result of this method (it could have a new element added to it), the changes to vsName will not be visible outside of the method. To prevent confusion, I often mark my method parameters final, which keeps them from being reassigned (accidentally or not) inside the method. This would keep the second example from compiling at all.


No comments:

Post a Comment

plot explanation - Why did Peaches' mom hang on the tree? - Movies & TV

In the middle of the movie Ice Age: Continental Drift Peaches' mom asked Peaches to go to sleep. Then, she hung on the tree. This parti...